Sample · 3 tasks · 1 NPC

Contract Clause Evaluation

Frontier models graded against a written rubric, with explicit obligations, with verdicts that say fit for use or not fit for use.

Preliminary Provisions

Definitions

Intepretation variation 1

fail · strict fail
Coverage
75%
Verdict
FAIL
Confidence
0.97
Tokens
211 / 4,884
in / out

Prompt · Candidate · Rubric

Prompt
Candidate · claude-opus-4-7 (max)
Rubric · gold standard

Obligation coverage

ObligationPresentEvidenceNote
Consideration of good faith in interpretationNOThe clause sets various interpretation rules but does not require interpretation to consider or be guided by good faith.
Consideration of the economic purpose of provisions in interpretationYESThe candidate's interpretation rules are consistent with construing provisions in light of their economic and commercial purpose.
Consideration of the parties' common intent at execution in interpretationNOThe clause sets general construction rules but does not state that interpretation should consider the parties' common intent at the time of execution.
Exclusion of headings and titles from interpretive effectYESthe headings and sub-headings to the Sections, Schedules, Annexes and Exhibits are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of this AgreementThis expressly states that headings/sub-headings have no interpretive effect.
Reciprocal reading of singular and plural termsYESwords denoting the singular include the plural and vice versaThis expressly provides the reciprocal singular/plural interpretation rule.
Gender-inclusive reading of references to one genderYESwords denoting any gender include all gendersThis expressly provides that references to one gender are to be read inclusively as covering all genders.
Reading of internal structural references as references within this agreementYESany reference to a Section, Schedule, Annex or Exhibit is a reference to a section of, or schedule, annex or exhibit to, this AgreementThis expressly provides that structural references are to provisions within this Agreement.
Illustrative non-limiting reading of expansive listing termsYESthe words "include", "includes" and "including" shall be construed as if followed by the words "without limitation"The clause expressly makes expansive listing terms illustrative and non-limiting.
Inclusion of amendments and replacements in legal referencesYESany reference to any statute, statutory provision, regulation, treaty, directive, code or other instrument having the force of law shall be construed as a reference to such statute, statutory provision, regulation, treaty, directive, code or instrument as in force from time to time and as amended, consolidated, modified, re-enacted or replacedThe clause expressly states that legal references include amended and replaced versions.
Apply assigned meanings to capitalized terms wherever defined in the agreementNOThe clause defines a few specific terms and cross-references others, but it does not state a general rule that capitalized terms carry their assigned meanings wherever defined in the agreement.
Exclusion of drafter-based adverse construction against any partyYESthe rule of construction known as the contra proferentem rule, and any other rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguity is to be resolved against the drafting party, shall not applyThe clause expressly disapplies adverse construction against the drafting party.
Priority of the main body over annexes and schedules absent express overrideYESIn the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of the main body of this Agreement and the provisions of any Schedule, Annex or Exhibit, the provisions of the main body of this Agreement shall prevail, save to the extent that the relevant Schedule, Annex or Exhibit expressly states that it is to prevail.This expressly gives priority to the main body over schedules/annexes/exhibits unless an express override is stated.

Judge reasoning

The candidate is not fit for use because it omits three core interpretive directions expressly embodied in the reference clause: interpretation by reference to good faith, the economic purpose of the provisions, and the Parties' common intent at execution. In addition, it introduces numerous extra interpretive and substantive rules that materially affect rights and obligations beyond the reference, including deemed amendment of document references. Although much of the standard boilerplate is competently drafted, the omissions and additions mean it is not a reliable substitute for the reference in a live agreement.

Missing obligations

  • Consideration of good faith in interpretation
  • Consideration of the parties' common intent at execution in interpretation
  • Apply assigned meanings to capitalized terms wherever defined in the agreement

Hallucinations

  • Provision that recitals, schedules, annexes and exhibits form an integral part of the Agreement
  • Detailed time-computation rules for periods expressed in days, months or years
  • Definition of "Affiliate" and "Control"
  • Requirement that consent/approval/agreement/satisfaction/discretion be in writing and given in advance
  • Cross-jurisdiction substitution rule for English legal concepts
  • Joint-and-several liability rule for obligations of two or more persons
  • Statement that each party had the benefit of independent legal advice
  • Provision that the Agreement is intended to take effect as a deed/agreement under hand

Drafting issues

  • Clause [●].3 is an elective operative statement rather than a pure interpretation rule and is left uncompleted, creating uncertainty as to the Agreement's legal character.
  • The statement that each party participated with the benefit of independent legal advice may be factually inaccurate if not verified, creating avoidable risk.
  • Cross-reference to Section [Definitions] is not usable as drafted unless that section exists and is correctly numbered.