Sample · 3 tasks · 1 NPC
Contract Clause Evaluation
Frontier models graded against a written rubric, with explicit obligations, with verdicts that say fit for use or not fit for use.
Preliminary Provisions
Definitions
Intepretation variation 1
Prompt · Candidate · Rubric
Obligation coverage
Judge reasoning
The candidate is not fit for use because it omits three core interpretive directions expressly embodied in the reference clause: interpretation by reference to good faith, the economic purpose of the provisions, and the Parties' common intent at execution. In addition, it introduces numerous extra interpretive and substantive rules that materially affect rights and obligations beyond the reference, including deemed amendment of document references. Although much of the standard boilerplate is competently drafted, the omissions and additions mean it is not a reliable substitute for the reference in a live agreement.
Missing obligations
- Consideration of good faith in interpretation
- Consideration of the parties' common intent at execution in interpretation
- Apply assigned meanings to capitalized terms wherever defined in the agreement
Hallucinations
- Provision that recitals, schedules, annexes and exhibits form an integral part of the Agreement
- Detailed time-computation rules for periods expressed in days, months or years
- Definition of "Affiliate" and "Control"
- Requirement that consent/approval/agreement/satisfaction/discretion be in writing and given in advance
- Cross-jurisdiction substitution rule for English legal concepts
- Joint-and-several liability rule for obligations of two or more persons
- Statement that each party had the benefit of independent legal advice
- Provision that the Agreement is intended to take effect as a deed/agreement under hand
Drafting issues
- Clause [●].3 is an elective operative statement rather than a pure interpretation rule and is left uncompleted, creating uncertainty as to the Agreement's legal character.
- The statement that each party participated with the benefit of independent legal advice may be factually inaccurate if not verified, creating avoidable risk.
- Cross-reference to Section [Definitions] is not usable as drafted unless that section exists and is correctly numbered.